SINA's antispam system is bogous
It seems that sina’s bad-brainly designed anti-spam system is going to do more foolishnesses. By applying their RFC-violence, they did not blocked spam and in addition, make normal mail slow and even not deliverable.
共 107 篇文章。
It seems that sina’s bad-brainly designed anti-spam system is going to do more foolishnesses. By applying their RFC-violence, they did not blocked spam and in addition, make normal mail slow and even not deliverable.
It seems that postfix 2.1-RELEASE will include an amazing feature called “policy server”, which can be used to implement greylisting, a brand new and effective technique to fight against spammers.
| |
Sorry for my ignorance, but it seems that NetBSD has imported postfix to their source tree for at least a year!
Finally I have built it and deployed it. Apparantly, it DOES NOT WORK(detects spams correctly, but did not take any actions!), but I hope the virus filter will be working, as the viruses are growing too fast.
Dong CHE has told me that mail from mail.freebsdchina.org has been bounced back because it was listed in rblplus.mail-abuse.org. From the query page I found mail.freebsdchina.org were listed in mail-abuse.org’s DUL by mistake (I believe so because the mail.freebsdchina.org block is not owned by dial up user).
With more and more aaazzz’s received on beastie.frontfree.net, it makes me to seriously consider the possiblity to set up a set of early filter on postfix.
There are two common way to process unaccepted letters: One is bounce, a.k.a. give the sender a message saying “Your letter is bounced.” Another is discard, in other words, drop the letter silently.
As some of you may know, I am planning to buy a server with some friends and take it in an IDC by the time I will be graduated from the university. The server will be primarily do personal web, ftp hosting, as well as mail service and DNS service.
I have noticed that the FreeBSD mailing list stops to send me mail from circa 19:05 CST here yesterday. What happend?!